By Robert Schlesinger
Boston Globe June 15, 2004
Under Homeland Security orders, journalists from England, Sweden, Holland and
other friendly countries are being detained at U.S. airports, strip-searched and
deported.
The Department of Homeland Security has started enforcing an
obscure provision in immigration law requiring foreign journalists to seek
special visas before entering the United States, even though their non-reporting
countrymen can enter without any visa at all. Last year, at least 13 foreign
journalists were detained and deported at U.S. airports -- most in Los Angeles
-- according to the advocacy group
Reporters Without Borders.
At least one more journalist was similarly turned away this year after being
detained, interrogated and strip-searched.
Why does the "land of the free" need to specially monitor and control the
flow of incoming journalists? "Considering the fact that the United States has
never licensed journalists, that in the United States anyone can be a journalist
and that because most countries that require special visas for journalists tend
to be totalitarian states, I think it's kind of stupid," said Lucy Dalglish,
executive director of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.
Under the Visa Waiver Program, citizens of 27 countries -- predominately from
Western Europe -- can visit the U.S. for up to 90 days without first getting a
visa. Among the questionable characters ineligible for visa waiver are convicted
criminals, people with communicable diseases, suspected terrorists, slave
traders -- and reporters. However, according to journalist advocacy groups, the
law lay dormant until March 2003 when the Department of Homeland Security
formally incorporated the Immigration and Naturalization Service and suddenly
began enforcing it. (A spokesman for DHS said that while he could not cite
specific cases, he did recall it having come up in the past.)
"It's really a slap in the face to the entire industry," said Kevin Goldberg,
an attorney for the American Society of Newspaper Editors. "Not to mention the treatment of these people who have come here -- not just
deported but really seized at the airport and violated at the airport. These are
journalists, not terrorists, suspected terrorists. Their only weapon is their
pen."
The most recent incident occurred in early May when Elena Lappin, a British
freelance journalist traveling to Los Angeles to work on a story for the
Guardian of London, was detained, questioned, strip-searched, handcuffed and
taken to a downtown holding facility for the night. Twenty-six hours after
arriving, she was put back on a plane to England. Instead of writing the article
she planned, she gave the Guardian
2,400 words on her Kafkaesque encounter.
Lappin's case is not isolated. In 2003, 12 journalists were detained at and
deported from LAX. Last March, a Danish photographer had DNA samples taken
before he was deported. That same month, a Swedish reporter was turned away at a
Washington airport, where he was photographed and fingerprinted, and not allowed
to call his embassy. Last May, six French reporters in two groups were detained
at LAX; they were on assignment to cover a video-game trade fair. All were
deported, the first three "after being repeatedly questioned and body-searched
six times," according to Reporters Without Borders. Similar fates awaited a
Swedish freelancer in May, a pair of Dutch reporters that same month trying to
cover an awards ceremony for world film stunt champions, a British reporter in
October and an Austrian in December. In many of the cases, the reporters were
treated like criminals: handcuffed and taken to prison holding facilities where
some were not allowed to sleep. According to Bill Strassberger, a spokesman for
the Department of Homeland Security, detention and handcuffing of journalists is
simply the product of following regulations. Once someone is rejected, the
airline that brought them is required to return them, and in some cases flights
are not available for 24 hours. "If they have to be transported to another
location, then procedure requires that they be restrained," Strassberger said. "It's
unfortunate because I know every time you hear about one of those things you
cringe, but you do have that concern for officer safety."
Strassberger denied that the law requiring special journalist visas -- called
"I visas" -- had lain dormant, but nevertheless acknowledged that it is being
more vigorously enforced, because, he said, "quite honestly, 9/11. It goes back
to after the terrorist attack, the inspections process, the inspectors, the
customs and border protection officers are just being a little more thorough, a
little more careful about who's coming in."
Reporters Without Borders, the American Society of Newspaper Editors, and the
International Press Institute have all raised a hue and cry, which prompted U.S.
Customs and Border Protection commissioner Robert C. Bonner to issue an advisory
on May 20 allowing individual immigration officials to let "nonthreatening"
reporters into the country without a visa -- once. "We are an open society and
we want people to feel welcome here," Bonner said, apparently without any irony.
But as Goldberg, ASNE's lawyer, pointed out, the underlying problems remain
unsolved. What happens if a foreign reporter who's had his or her one waiver
needs to get into the U.S. to cover a breaking news event, like a real terrorist
attack? "Another problem is that it opens the door to content review," Goldberg
said. Added Dalglish: "Once you start putting an immigration officer at an
airport in charge of who in the world is entitled to be a journalist and who
isn't, that's on the path to defining who's an American journalist."
The other unanswered question is: Whose idea was it to crack down on the
supposed menace of invading foreign media hordes. "The Bush administration
doesn't like the press?" Goldberg asked rhetorically. "That's the best I can
come up with, frankly. They've been reluctant for almost four years now to give
information out to the press. They don't deal with the press on a level playing
field. They've made life hard on other civil liberties. I can't imagine them
bending over backward to help the press."
....back to:
....alternative news
American Pictures
....gives Moore
thanks
....gives pizza
.....gives the plane truth
....gives
liberation
.....gives you the
blues
......gives Bush a human face
.....gives billionaires for Bush a free rap
....gives you the
world vote on Bush-Kerry
|